Really shouldn't they have at least £1000 in the hopper surely!?
Any views on this?
Edit: By the way can the size of the hopper effect the chances of getting a Jp? or would it give it reguardless?
Edited by hurricane, 24 April 2009 - 11:05 AM.
Posted 24 April 2009 - 11:00 AM
Edited by hurricane, 24 April 2009 - 11:05 AM.
Posted 24 April 2009 - 11:07 AM
Im really getting fed up with the reel king in my local arcade cause its payed out no more than 2 jp's in like a year or so, on the machine it doesn't say what % it is so i asked the staff who im friends with and said 90% and i thought as if. Anyway onto the real issue five days ago the hopper emptied on reel king and yesterday the hopper was empty again, so i asked why it could empty so soon after just being topped up and they replied it only has a £600 hopper so just laughed and said how can a £500 jp machine have such a small hopper?. Is this normal?
Really shouldn't they have at least £1000 in the hopper surely!?
Any views on this?
Posted 24 April 2009 - 12:13 PM
reel king doesn't have a % payout coz its a random genarated number machine ITS RANDOM!!
Posted 24 April 2009 - 12:22 PM
Granted, but if thats the case why does elvis, cashino, Rainbow Riches etc. have percentage payouts when they are ment to be random?
Posted 24 April 2009 - 12:29 PM
all the RGN machines upto £250 jackpot was on % payouts
however all the £500 jackpots where on RGN and not % payout
hope this helps
Posted 24 April 2009 - 02:24 PM
on the machine it doesn't say what % it is so i asked the staff who im friends with and said 90%
Posted 24 April 2009 - 04:19 PM
All random machines have a percentage target, which is worked out using the amount of numbers the machine can pick (say 00001>10000), what each number is worth, and so on.
By having both the amount of numbers, and the amount and value of the prize each number awards, you should end up with the percentage shown on the machine.
Then we get more interesting things like 'HARD' and 'SOFT' profile. Again, they can keep the same percentage payout, but the wins are tilted in a different direction - more small/medium wins for a softer game, or sacrifice more of the small/medium wins for a higher jackpot frequency.
Having said that, I still don't trust the bloody things, and really hope I manage to go the rest of my life without touching a B3 or upwards ever again.
I find that worrying. The whole point of current Gamcare / BACTA guidelines (fairness and openness objective?) is to ensure the player knows, before they play a machine, what odds they are aiming for.
The machine *must* display on it somewhere what percentage is on - however I know some machines try to hide it in a menu, perhaps under 'help' or something similar.
Edited by fruitman69, 24 April 2009 - 04:27 PM.
Posted 24 April 2009 - 04:23 PM
Im really getting fed up with the reel king in my local arcade cause its payed out no more than 2 jp's in like a year or so, on the machine it doesn't say what % it is so i asked the staff who im friends with and said 90% and i thought as if. Anyway onto the real issue five days ago the hopper emptied on reel king and yesterday the hopper was empty again, so i asked why it could empty so soon after just being topped up and they replied it only has a £600 hopper so just laughed and said how can a £500 jp machine have such a small hopper?. Is this normal?
Really shouldn't they have at least £1000 in the hopper surely!?
Any views on this?
Edit: By the way can the size of the hopper effect the chances of getting a Jp? or would it give it reguardless?
Posted 24 April 2009 - 04:35 PM
Posted 24 April 2009 - 04:53 PM
and they are on soft setting which is default and unless you have new settings sheet you will never get a jackpot on this setting .
Posted 24 April 2009 - 05:30 PM
http://www.youtube.com/FruitVideos - My youtube channel
https://drive.google...&usp=drive_link - My Drive
Posted 24 April 2009 - 07:08 PM
Posted 24 April 2009 - 07:42 PM
Posted 24 April 2009 - 08:35 PM
Posted 25 April 2009 - 02:15 AM
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:27 AM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users