7 replies to this topic

[wearecity]

File Name: The Italian Job (2) - Epoch £15, 30p 80%

File Submitter: wearecity

File Submitted: 18 May 2018

File Category: Epoch

Here's The Italian Job by Maygay. Commonly referred to as Italian Job 2, but I don't believe that is the machines actual name.
 
It an Epoch machine. Set on 30p play, £15 and 80%.
 
Shortcuts are in the notes, but here also, 0= inset £1, 1-3 = Holds, ' = cancel, space = start, e=exchange, c=collect, h=take cash, f=take feature, n=collect nudges,  Collect Cash Knockouts = K
Collect Feature Knockouts = T
 
Thanks to whoever provided the roms. Nickyerpesos for the Project Amber layout that gave me some info. Vecs for the reels from IJ3 and whoever provided the reels in the first place. Wizard for MFME.
 
You may get a font missing message, Invite SF font. it is in the attachment if you don't already have it. It is used in the machine name, but doesn't look too bad without it anyway.
 
No known issues with the machine, best thing about it is probably the sound though.
 
Hopefully a DX of it one day, as Ross looks to have started one. See to post on this link. https://www.fruitemu...ian#entry284249

Click here to download this file

[cashbox1]

many thanks for this

[vectra666]

Thankyou, I think the actual name of this machine is,

The Italian Job 'this is the self preservation society' as that's what it says twice on the actual image I uploaded of this.

Attached Files

•  gallery_17577_106_236985.jpg   443.96KB   1 downloads

Edited by vectra666, 18 May 2018 - 06:17 AM.

[prizeguy2005]

cheers if i remember this was a very slow running game could almost hear the machine reading through its code how to find a number to land you on a game over square

[andy-1]

Thank You

[TommyC]

Thanka for this.

[wearecity]

cheers if i remember this was a very slow running game could almost hear the machine reading through its code how to find a number to land you on a game over square

Thanks for the thanks guys.

On the Project Amber version of the layout, the above is definitely quite a regular occurrence.

But it's no so blatant or regular on MFME. Perhaps the difference is to do with the emulators reading the code.

[Scottyfish]

Thank you!