Posted 07 November 2005 - 12:29 AM
Now Im a little confused...
1. These machines are claimed to be TOTALLY RANDOM.
(just repeat that again - TOTALL 100 percent random...........)
So each spin has a equal chance of winning the jackpot.
2. These machines are fixed at 94 or 96 percent payout.........
Hang on, the very nature of randomness means that (however unlikely) it is possible for a RANDOM machine to NEVER EVER payout AT ALL IN ITS LIFE.
Its unlikely, but possible, as the numbers are random.
Statistically, yes, its unlikely, but NO ONE ON THIS EARTH can PROVE that a machine, that is RANDOM, will pay out at any time in its life.
If the numbers are random, there is a chance it will never pay.
Random, and fixed percentages dont go together in a legal sense of the word.
Yes a machine may randomly have a 96 percent chance of winning, but if it genuinely is random, then they cant PROVE it will ever pay out. Its against the nature of randomness to be able to do so.
Obviously the machines do pay out, but the logic is flawed, and as they wont prove anything by being open about how its done, common sense dictates they have something to HIDE.