Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

WIP - Super Blackjack Club


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#1 stuart

stuart

    Newbie

  • New Members
  • 45 posts

Posted 31 December 2005 - 09:18 AM

Hi all,
For my second layout I'm having a go at Super Blackjack Club. What I'm trying to do, which I don't think I've seen before, is use two actual photographs, one with the machine turned off and one with it lit. In fact I've had to take about a dozen 'lit' images because you can't get all the bulbs lit at the same time, and then paste each lit bulb onto the unlit image. This is a very early WIP and it looks like a patchwork quilt in places at the moment, but I think the end result I'm after is possible...
Happy New Year to all,
Stuart

Attached Files

  • Attached File  SBJ.jpg   199.34KB   207 downloads


#2 ady

ady

    The furniture

  • Moderators
  • 14204 posts

Posted 31 December 2005 - 10:34 AM

One hell of a job stuart....surely impossible, i'd say even using a tripod it will move very very slightly which will show on the Emu causing the lamp to jump.

Hopefully you'll get around it though, looking forward to the result.

#3 Bencrest

Bencrest

    The furniture

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7446 posts

Posted 31 December 2005 - 10:24 PM

I'd considered doing this before but wasn't sure of how it would look... if that WIP is anything to go by though it could be a very good idea :D
Ben
 
Hopefully recovering from years of compulsive gambling and wanting to be gamble free forever.
 
Recommended reading - http://www.gamblersaloud.com/ (yes, I bought the book, very happy with it!)

#4 Guest_madman_*

Guest_madman_*
  • Guests

Posted 01 January 2006 - 12:47 AM

wow. nice one. i was actually doing this one a while back but the known glass scans were not very forthcoming and i was hacking various machine scans to try and recreate it..
the hi lo feature on this was tricky as well if memory serves. using mirrors on the card fan. this is my fave machine and wouldn,t mind the photo,s when you have released to try and do one for meself.
great job

#5 ady

ady

    The furniture

  • Moderators
  • 14204 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 05:09 PM

I'd considered doing this before but wasn't sure of how it would look... if that WIP is anything to go by though it could be a very good idea :D


Really don't think it's possible though......surely theres no way to get 2 images spot-on (Machine off and On) even with a tripod :confused:

And to take pic's at random (eg by hand) there is no way every lamp can line up without flicker between On and Off...however good at Photoshop you are...it'll take an age to do them all given some 60 odd lamps?

#6 miked

miked

    Junior Member

  • New Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 05:15 PM

i use to play this in the club i use about to download it and will let you know

#7 Guest_madman_*

Guest_madman_*
  • Guests

Posted 01 January 2006 - 05:16 PM

Really don't think it's possible though......surely theres no way to get 2 images spot-on (Machine off and On) even with a tripod :confused:

And to take pic's at random (eg by hand) there is no way every lamp can line up without flicker between On and Off...however good at Photoshop you are...it'll take an age to do them all given some 60 odd lamps?

thats why i would like the artwork in an off state only and do all the lamps individually......

#8 ady

ady

    The furniture

  • Moderators
  • 14204 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 05:16 PM

i use to play this in the club i use about to download it and will let you know


Whats this the answer to???????????????????

#9 ady

ady

    The furniture

  • Moderators
  • 14204 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 05:18 PM

thats why i would like the artwork in an off state only and do all the lamps individually......


Call me thick but..........it's being asked for 2 images.........it's nearly impossible to create One image with no flicker...........they would have to be 100% identical....and that isn't possible.

#10 ady

ady

    The furniture

  • Moderators
  • 14204 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 05:30 PM

The easiest way I can see is to take the On image and simply darken..no more hard work than that...

I have attached an Example of One I did on cashpack as I used this method on that....if you switch between the 2 images below they don't move as they are the same.

Attached Files



#11 Guest_madman_*

Guest_madman_*
  • Guests

Posted 01 January 2006 - 09:23 PM

i use to play this in the club i use about to download it and will let you know

download what it a wip.

#12 RB

RB

    PISH Artist

  • Layout Creator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3342 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 09:41 PM

Easiest way to do 2 identical flicker free images is to use a tripod and step timer take the first image with all lamps lit in test mode then switch off the machine before the second image is shot...and if your using and old fashioned SlR camera, get a cable release.

RB
Cyberpunk:- alienated loner who lives on the edge of society in generally dystopic future where daily life is impacted by rapid technological change, an ubiquitous datasphere of computerized information, and invasive modification of the human body.....Hmmmmm

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

#13 ady

ady

    The furniture

  • Moderators
  • 14204 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 09:46 PM

Easiest way to do 2 identical flicker free images is to use a tripod and step timer take the first image with all lamps lit in test mode then switch off the machine before the second image is shot...and if your using and old fashioned SlR camera, get a cable release.

RB


Then RB trying to match them....................Major headache

#14 RB

RB

    PISH Artist

  • Layout Creator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3342 posts

Posted 01 January 2006 - 10:13 PM

as long as the tripod isnt moved or the camera, which you shouldnt have to do if the step timer option on digital camera is used then they should be near identical except in the on/off state...and if your using an SLR then make sure it has power wind...

A little preparation in making the power switch easily accessable within the step timers range..makes things a little easier.

1. Open Backdoor enter test mode all lamps lit
2 position camera on tripod
3 set camera for best fit of the fruity full screen res etc.
set step timer, say 3 images 20 secs apart
4 set off 1st exposure...
5 run to power switch before 2nd/3rd exposure

then if you are using the standard Top half/ Bottom half scenario, move camera on its vertical axis and shoot second half.
Using a program like Autostitch makes piecing the final images together rather splendid...
Cyberpunk:- alienated loner who lives on the edge of society in generally dystopic future where daily life is impacted by rapid technological change, an ubiquitous datasphere of computerized information, and invasive modification of the human body.....Hmmmmm

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

#15 stuart

stuart

    Newbie

  • New Members
  • 45 posts

Posted 02 January 2006 - 09:53 AM

Hi all,
What RB is saying is pretty much what I did; I mounted the camera on a sturdy tripod and took about 20 - 30 pictures using a remote release, with the machine in attract mode. Across all of the images I therefore have at least one with each lamp lit. Alignment with the unlit image has turned out to be easier than i thought - the original images are all 2272 x 1704 so by working on them at that size and using the zoom, pixel-perfect alignment is not too difficult to achieve. I know that this isn't the normal way to go about things; when I did 'Stake Up' last year I used software to light each lamp individually; but since I have SBJ in my back bedroom at the moment I thought I'd take the opportunity to try something different. It'll be a while before it's done though as it's only my second layout...
Stuart

#16 Guest_madman_*

Guest_madman_*
  • Guests

Posted 13 January 2006 - 01:51 PM

any news on this one......

#17 DildoDez

DildoDez

    Senior Member

  • Regulars
  • 1104 posts

Posted 21 March 2006 - 11:01 PM

How's this coming along?

#18 ady

ady

    The furniture

  • Moderators
  • 14204 posts

Posted 22 March 2006 - 02:04 PM

I'd say it was given up as an impossible job..........

I still cannot see how you can, with a tripod of not use Two seperate images (On/Off) and merge them.

We all know the slightest misalignment causes a massively noticeable flicker.

#19 mocochoco

mocochoco

    Senior Member

  • Regulars
  • 1380 posts

Posted 22 March 2006 - 02:49 PM

I'd say it was given up as an impossible job..........

I still cannot see how you can, with a tripod of not use Two seperate images (On/Off) and merge them.

We all know the slightest misalignment causes a massively noticeable flicker.


But as RB said if you are using a digi camera with i tripod and using the time delay then all it is is a case of lamps on in test mode.... then off. I cant see how that would go wrong. you would have two identical pictures apart from one lit and one unlit.


moco

EDIT: the only problem i can really see occuring is once you have the pics im sure they are gonna need some slight touching up here and there and you have to make sure that this is exactly the same on both lit and unlit images.
On a normal glass scan or flyer based dx you can get all the touching up done on the original image before you start on a lit one.
But tbh that really wont be a very hard job at all (might not need much doing to it at all depending on the quality of the pics).

"The cue tip is the most important thing, give me a broomstick with a good tip on it and il shoot the lights out, then sweep the joint when im done" (Willie Mosconi)


#20 ady

ady

    The furniture

  • Moderators
  • 14204 posts

Posted 22 March 2006 - 03:16 PM

I have bought 6 machines purely to emulate..........I also have a Digi Camera and tripod.........and have tried this in practice long before this thread was written!

I still disagree that it's an easy task............

No Two pictures will EVER be identical.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users