Hi Fruit-Emu fans
Well Jackson might have a result. What about the kids in this world who are still being abused as i write this. I agree with what other members say, another peado on the loose. Well i thought i would start a poll to see what Fruit-Emu members think. Please keep this thread clean and cheers for voting.
Barmypluto
- Fruit-Emu
- → Viewing Profile: Topics: Barmypluto
Community Stats
- Group New Members
- Active Posts 22
- Profile Views 2008
- Member Title Barmypluto
- Age 56 years old
- Birthday July 5, 1968
-
Gender
Not Telling
Converted
-
Biography
I'm a 36 year old bloke. i'm easy to get on with if you like a laugh and a giggle.
-
Location
Portsmouth
-
Interests
gambling, football, snooker, occassional nights out with mates.
-
Occupation
unemployed
Topics I've Started
!Michael J Poll Verdict!
14 June 2005 - 07:07 PM
chat room
04 June 2005 - 03:08 PM
hi peeps
There is a chat room on the go in fruit-emu. get your big fat ugly ass's over there and start chatting. cos i'm bored. lol
tim (barmypluto)
There is a chat room on the go in fruit-emu. get your big fat ugly ass's over there and start chatting. cos i'm bored. lol
tim (barmypluto)
!!!This Is A Genuine Virus Warning Alert!!!
03 June 2005 - 08:57 AM
Hello Chaps
This is a genuine warning alert to those of you that download from any site. There are Two High Risk trojan's going around. If these attach themselfs to your computer, you will have serious problems and you will probably have to re-install windows or windows xp, ect. The trojans to look out for are:
254D0FE9-E420-4314-BBEB-F1A3DB trojan horse Downloader.istbar.9.k
80D66D3A-315E-44B7-93C7-3149D8 trojan horse Downloader.istbar.9.I
Regards to all FRUIT-EMU members
Tim (Barmypluto)
This is a genuine warning alert to those of you that download from any site. There are Two High Risk trojan's going around. If these attach themselfs to your computer, you will have serious problems and you will probably have to re-install windows or windows xp, ect. The trojans to look out for are:
254D0FE9-E420-4314-BBEB-F1A3DB trojan horse Downloader.istbar.9.k
80D66D3A-315E-44B7-93C7-3149D8 trojan horse Downloader.istbar.9.I
Regards to all FRUIT-EMU members
Tim (Barmypluto)
!!!Off topic laugh!!!
14 May 2005 - 12:24 PM
Hi guys and gals
Upgrading to Wife 1.0
Last year a friend of mine upgraded from Girlfriend 4.0 to Wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving few system resources for other applications. He is also now noticing the Wife 1.0 is also spawning Child-processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomenon was included in the product documentation, though other users have informed me that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application.
Not only that, Wife 1.0 installs itself so that it is always launched at system initialization where it can monitor all other system activity. Some applications such as Poker Night 10.3 , Bachelor Party 2.5, and Pub Night 7.0 are no longer able to run on the system at all, causing the system to lockup when launched (even though the apps worked fine before).
Wife 1.0 provides no installation options. Thus, the installation of undesired plug-ins such as Mother-in-law 55.8 and the Brother-in-law Beta is unavoidable. Also, system performance seems to diminish with each passing day.
Some features my friend would like to see in the upcoming Wife 2.0:
A "don't remind me again" button.
Minimize button.
Ability to delete the "headache" file
An install feature that provides an option to uninstall 2.0 versions without loss of other system resources.
An option to run the network driver in "promiscuous mode" allowing the system's Hardware Probe feature to be much more useful/effective.
I myself wish I had decided to avoid all of the headaches associated with Wife 1.0 by sticking with Girlfriend 3.0 Even here, however, I have found many problems. Apparently you cannot install Girlfriend 4.0 on top of girlfriend 3.0. You must uninstall Girlfriend 3.0 first; otherwise the two versions of Girlfriend will have conflicts over shared use of the I/O port. Other users have told me that this is a long-standing problem that I should have been aware of. Guess that explains what happened to versions 1 and 2.
To make matters worse, the uninstall program for Girlfriend 3.0 doesn't work very well, leaving undesirable traces of the application in the system. Another identified problem is that all versions of Girlfriend have annoying little messages about the advantages of upgrading to Wife 1.0!
VIRUS ALERT
All users should be aware that Wife 1.0 has an undocumented bug. If you try to install Mistress 1.1 before uninstalling Wife 1.0, Wife 1.0 will delete MS Money files before doing the uninstall itself. Once that happens, Mistress 1.1 won't install and you will get an "insufficient resources" error message. To avoid the aforementioned bug, try installing Mistress 1.1 on a different system and " never" run any file transfer applications (such as Laplink) between the two systems.
FYI: Don't even think about a shared directory!!!
(Barmypluto)
Upgrading to Wife 1.0
Last year a friend of mine upgraded from Girlfriend 4.0 to Wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving few system resources for other applications. He is also now noticing the Wife 1.0 is also spawning Child-processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomenon was included in the product documentation, though other users have informed me that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application.
Not only that, Wife 1.0 installs itself so that it is always launched at system initialization where it can monitor all other system activity. Some applications such as Poker Night 10.3 , Bachelor Party 2.5, and Pub Night 7.0 are no longer able to run on the system at all, causing the system to lockup when launched (even though the apps worked fine before).
Wife 1.0 provides no installation options. Thus, the installation of undesired plug-ins such as Mother-in-law 55.8 and the Brother-in-law Beta is unavoidable. Also, system performance seems to diminish with each passing day.
Some features my friend would like to see in the upcoming Wife 2.0:
A "don't remind me again" button.
Minimize button.
Ability to delete the "headache" file
An install feature that provides an option to uninstall 2.0 versions without loss of other system resources.
An option to run the network driver in "promiscuous mode" allowing the system's Hardware Probe feature to be much more useful/effective.
I myself wish I had decided to avoid all of the headaches associated with Wife 1.0 by sticking with Girlfriend 3.0 Even here, however, I have found many problems. Apparently you cannot install Girlfriend 4.0 on top of girlfriend 3.0. You must uninstall Girlfriend 3.0 first; otherwise the two versions of Girlfriend will have conflicts over shared use of the I/O port. Other users have told me that this is a long-standing problem that I should have been aware of. Guess that explains what happened to versions 1 and 2.
To make matters worse, the uninstall program for Girlfriend 3.0 doesn't work very well, leaving undesirable traces of the application in the system. Another identified problem is that all versions of Girlfriend have annoying little messages about the advantages of upgrading to Wife 1.0!
VIRUS ALERT
All users should be aware that Wife 1.0 has an undocumented bug. If you try to install Mistress 1.1 before uninstalling Wife 1.0, Wife 1.0 will delete MS Money files before doing the uninstall itself. Once that happens, Mistress 1.1 won't install and you will get an "insufficient resources" error message. To avoid the aforementioned bug, try installing Mistress 1.1 on a different system and " never" run any file transfer applications (such as Laplink) between the two systems.
FYI: Don't even think about a shared directory!!!
(Barmypluto)
!!!Just a bit of off line topic fun!!!
01 March 2005 - 05:54 PM
Sorry guys, i know this is a well off the line topic. But i thought it was funny. Anyone that smokes pot will understand why.
8-) Anyone wanna share a pipe with me. 8)
- Fruit-Emu
- → Viewing Profile: Topics: Barmypluto
- Privacy Policy
- Forum Rules ·