Right, we all know the amount in the hoppers make very little difference to winning on machines. But when full, as we know it's dropping into the bottom making it profit, correct?
Well, why is it some new machines have a fake backing feature? surely it's not even considered a gamble then since you're only giving them money? It's not being taken into the hoppers, meaning it's profit for them, leaving the machines a little more empty.
If you play a machine that's backing, it's a way to draw people in, since they think it's full, which means a chance of jackots/streaks (at least the myth goes) but if it's dropping when the hoppers aren't full, isn't that illegal since you're not getting the full odds? They can take however much they want, since the machine can only have £30 in the hopper (enough to cover a £25) and take everything else as profit? Not really giving a fair chance is it?
Prove me wrong by all means, but this does seem a little off putting to me.
A friend of mine was down the local, put £40 through a machine to get a jackpot. All down the back. Took the £25 out, and it was instantly backing again. It doesn't replenish what's been taken.
Is that anywhere near correct?